Pontic Empire

Alright this is long overdue. Anyone know anything about the Pontic Empire, as it is very important as it comes into conflict with rome, as Mithrades finds out very quickly, a rome with sulla is not the place to attack.

All I know is that Mithadates killed all his relatives for the throne, and was kept in check by Marius, and then Sulla, until using the social wars of Rome as a disstraction and invading Greece. There is a great bust of him complete with lions pelt on his head in the louvre.

Alright this is long overdue. Anyone know anything about the Pontic Empire, as it is very important as it comes into conflict with rome, as Mithrades finds out very quickly, a rome with sulla is not the place to attack.

It's an area around Asia Minor that was settled by Greeks and thus Hellenized to some degree.

Mithradates tried to control the area to create a commercial empire based around the Black Sea trade routes. Hellenes dissatisfied with Roman rule sided with him. However, it only lasted as long as Rome was distracted. Once Rome got its act together the "empire" was taken over by Rome and divided into districts, and was later part of the Byzantine sphere of influence.

Beyond these simple facts, which you probably already know, I can't find more information. It doesn't seem to be terribly important except as a sideshow to the power struggles of the late Republican warlords.

I know something about pontic army:

Pontic army was combo of Greek, Persian, and their own...

The core of their army was made of heavily armoured catapharct cavalries, which were supported by horse archers and horse javeliners, like in the many eastern army. Infantry was made of rather light persian-type infantry,and phalanx lines. They also had chariots, slingers, archers...

I think it was something like this...

Damn, we really don't know, now do we? I don't know either.

The topology of Ukraine is primarily steepe, and I'm guessing that a navy was involved. Did he have a marine contengent?

Damn, we really don't know, now do we? I don't know either.

 

The topology of Ukraine is primarily steepe, and I'm guessing that a navy was involved. Did he have a marine contengent?

What does the Ukraine have to do with anything? The Pontic Empire included northern Asia Minor (Pontus, Bithynia, western Armenia), Asia Provincia, Galacia and the Cheronsis at its greatest extent.

Pontic army was combo of Greek, Persian, and their own...

 

The core of their army was made of heavily armoured catapharct cavalries, which were supported by horse archers and horse javeliners, like in the many eastern army. Infantry was made of rather light persian-type infantry,and phalanx lines. They also had chariots, slingers, archers...

 

I think it was something like this...

Yep, just like the Seleucids and Antigonids around them, they made use of a huge variety of troops.

Anyway, the Kingdom of Pontus was founded by Mithridates Ktistes in 281 BC. He was the son of the Persian satrap in Kios (of the same name), who was killed by Antigonus late in the 4th C. The kingdom was made notable by Mithridates VI and his wars with Rome.

What does the Ukraine have to do with anything? The Pontic Empire included northern Asia Minor (Pontus, Bithynia, western Armenia), Asia Provincia, Galacia and the Cheronsis at its greatest extent.

The Pontic Empire included Crimea (the part of Ucraine). This was main part of Pontic Empire. Mithridates used it like safety zone and place where he could to recruit scythians and sarmatians for pontic army. Many years pontic dynasties were on Bosporan throne.

The topology of Ukraine is primarily steepe, and I'm guessing that a navy was involved. Did he have a marine contengent?

The topology of Crimea are hills with dense forest and forbidding rocks along of coastline. There are a lot of good bays between rocks. Mithridates had a navy of course and he used it in the Black Sea.

The plains would be natural recruiting ground, would it not? If he kept the locals in Central Ukrain employed by taking some of the mercenaries, it would not only explain Crimeria's security, but his rapid rise and fall. Calvary/Chariots might of just been a suplimentry support for anti-roman cities fielding largely thier own ntry armies, once they loose numbers, they would loose effectiveness. Also, the roman's could of cut off what I'm guessing would be the superior mobility of the ukranian troops by taking key transportation points.

I'm guessing the black sea was central to his mobility, the relying on either a asian or Anatolian calvary force as his offering to support local cities if Rome attacks. If one city is lost, they could retreat to the next unscathed and do it again at practically no cost to himself. Could he transport a large force between Europe and Asia quickly? Doubt it, by a 'successful' ground campaign in asia minor or europe by striking at the passes would be pointless, since he wouldn't be fighting linearly, the ability to pull out and strike from another direction must of been a strength in his opinion, juxapositioning his forces between Europe and Asia, the blacksea as his hinge.

Of course, once the defeats started rolling in, everything would collapse against him, public opinion, his main strength, would side with the romans, loosing his cities and infantry armies all at once. I think his Empire was little more than a tributary federation.

I don't really know thouh, I just pulled that all out of my butt. Any evidence to support my idea?

I think that the Scythians did indeed hire out as mercs, but not to a great degree I don't think, and I don't remember reading about Mithridates having help from them. If I am not mistaken I believe more cavalry help came from Armenia.

I think the safty of Crimea/Cheronesis(sp?) came from the fortification of the cities, the general topology and the prosperity of the land. The kingdom that once ruled this land was a strong one. My guess is Mithridates got taxes and grain supplies from this area as a part of the boon of his little empire.

I think the safty of Crimea/Cheronesis(sp?) came from the fortification of the cities, the general topology and the prosperity of the land. The kingdom that once ruled this land was a strong one. My guess is Mithridates got taxes and grain supplies from this area as a part of the boon of his little empire.

Yes. Besides that the Greek colonies in Crimea provided Mithridates with fleet. Greeks always were skilled ship-builder. As to fortification in Crimea they weren't earnest. Only later in Genoa time the fortifications will be more well-founded.

I think that the Scythians did indeed hire out as mercs, but not to a great degree I don't think, and I don't remember reading about Mithridates having help from them.

You're right, in fact, Mithridates fought (and defeated) the Scythians in the Crimea in the late 2nd C.

Alright, I'm wrong. Hari Kari, here I come....

Yeah, Pontus took over the Crimea pretty late. Does anyone know how the kingdom actually was created, and when? I think RTW said Pontus was created when Alexander's empire fell apart into the separate kingdoms. Then some guy took advantage of the chaos and created the kingdom of Pontus. But its bad to rely on a video game for facts.

Yeah, Pontus took over the Crimea pretty late. Does anyone know how the kingdom actually was created, and when?

Well, I had said a little bit about this above:

"Anyway, the Kingdom of Pontus was founded by Mithridates Ktistes in 281 BC. He was the son of the Persian satrap in Kios (of the same name), who was killed by Antigonus late in the 4th C."

As for the "how?": After his father's death, Mithridates Ktistes fled to a fort in Paphlagonia where he drew supporters (to defend against the imminent attack of Antigonus), and his territories and followers eventually grew to include most of Pontus.