Christianity As A Mystery Religion

I heard that early Christianity was a mystery religion in Rome, is this true and does anyone know any of the characteristics of mystery religions (i know that they were a secret but did anything come out about it), was it a popular one, like were there many Romans who joined it, also did Mystery religions have supernatural events that happened, as i read that in some mystery religions, people would enter the spirit world or supernatural realm.

Anyway, i hope that made sense, and thanks for any help.

I can't really give you insight as to the first part of you post but in regards to some of the other Mystery Cults; it appears that many of the rights dealt with the concept of death and resurrection. So in a sense yes they did enter a spiritual realm during the rights, albeit symbolically.

However, I have read interesting interpretations of what the Eleusinian Mysteries were all about and that they may have used psychotropic substances in the rights to make that entering the spirit realm all the more realistic

Perhaps the method of worship was more akin to what we would now consider to be "in the manner of a mystery" due to the need for secrecy-may I suggest rifling through Jung's collected works to lead you toward sources on Gnostic Christianity, Mithras and other "cults" , Joseph Campbell (as suggested elsewhere-a pupil of Jung ) is always worth looking at for signposts to religious experience in historical context. I think Vol; ( "Aion" of Jungs works might spark some trails to other sources.

Perhaps the method of worship was more akin to what we would now consider to be "in the manner of a mystery" due to the need for secrecy-may I suggest rifling through Jung's collected works to lead you toward sources on Gnostic Christianity, Mithras and other "cults" , Joseph Campbell (as suggested elsewhere-a pupil of Jung ) is always worth looking at for signposts to religious experience in historical context. I think Vol; ( "Aion" of Jungs works might spark some trails to other sources.

My suggestion (I say this as a non-expert in the field) is that the Eucharist / Communion counts as a mystery, from the point of view of ancient religious observers, because the bread and wine are said to be the body and blood of Christ. After all, they don't appear to be: you must have faith / be initiated into the religion before you'll accept it.

This is one thing the Cathars wouldn't accept, incidentally. They said the bread and wine were just bread and wine. On the other hand, according to the Cathars, the 'daily bread' prayed for in the Lord's Prayer was not bread at all, but the True Gospel. But the Cathars, I fear, are off topic.

The Roman objection to Christianity was a horror at the concept of the consumption of the "body and blood" of Christ-and some of course thought this was literal -and if not literal seriously weird!

Rome 16:16 Bible , "greet each other of a holy kiss, all Church of Christ greet you."

the first century chruch was secret just because they are persecuted, no more no less .

how could you convert Romanus to a very foreign and persecuted religion...

if they offer no salvation from eternal condamnation in the lake of fire for our sin.

...and offer forgiveness and everlasting life for the true Church of Christ members only...

and ressurection to life...on the day of judgement of the Lord God... in the end of the world.

Also it might very well be possible that the Romans knew more about the beliefs of this cult of the Christ than what little we have in the histories that survive today. Surely a Roman would have a problem with the concept of some god annihilating the entire world with a great flood simply because he was displeased. Or the concept of perverse self-mutilation (circumcision).

Or the concept of perverse self-mutilation (circumcision).

Point already taken, but that part I can't really apply to the mystery because most of the Christians were Gentile which meant they weren't circumcised. Anyways, Paul preached to uncircumcised people. The circumcision issue only applied to Judea and surrounding nearby areas where the Jewish converts demanded Gentiles be circumcised, but Rome is different I suppose.

Well you know how rumors go. If it's true for some, or even remotely so, it will eventually be seen as true of them all.

I heard that early Christianity was a mystery religion in Rome, is this true and does anyone know any of the characteristics of mystery religions (i know that they were a secret but did anything come out about it), was it a popular one, like were there many Romans who joined it, also did Mystery religions have supernatural events that happened, as i read that in some mystery religions, people would enter the spirit world or supernatural realm.

 

Anyway, i hope that made sense, and thanks for any help.

Although spirituality was undoubtedly an aspect of ancient Roman mystery religions, the surviving evidence points primarily to ritual actions with symbolic meaning as comprising the core of the ritual activity of these religions, especially the more popular, better known ones. For example, towards the end of a lengthy and elaborate service, some secret object or action would be revealed with deep symbolic meaning to those trained in the belief system of the religion. This the initiates were sworn to keep secret, and in most cases did, as we are still ignorant of most of the core mysteries today.

When scholars speak of Christianity as a mystery religion, this points to the striking similarity between Christian rituals as they developed in the Greek and Roman worlds (such as the Roman Catholic eucharist or mass) and what we know of the mystery religions. In fact, the closest thing today to the celebration of the ancient mysteries, or even of the liturgies of the Roman public or state religion, is a traditional Roman Catholic mass with its processions and candles and incense.

All of this was quite different than the appearance that these Christian rituals had in their initially Jewish setting. The eucharist or mass as celebrated by Jews who believed in Jesus was simply the ordinary blessings said at the beginning of a communal meal, though elaborated to reflect their beliefs in the importance of Jesus' death and resurrection.

Among the non-Jewish Christians in Rome and elsewhere, all this was soon changed. The blessings were removed from a meal setting and placed in a morning worship service that had more in common with pagan Roman rites than with the Jewish original. As in the mystery religions, special ritual objects (the cup and bread) were revealed at the end of a long ritual only to those properly initiated. And it came to be believed that something mysterious and magical happened at the exact moment when the priest said certain words over them: that the wine and bread actually became, physically, the body and blood of Christ.

Needless to say, this was not the original idea, even in Rome, but the result of a development over centuries that took into account local ideas about religion, including that of the mystery religions. The original Jewish commemoration was more an act of corporate memory, as in the Passover meal with which it was first associated, in which past events were brought into living memory. In the Roman context, this communal family-style event was transformed over time into a more philosophically understood spiritual action that focused more and more on the actions of a priest and less and less on the familial life of a community. This was the result, in part, of the influence of the mystery religions.

Trances and ecstatic states were associated more with the barbarian religions at the edges of the Roman empire, though many of these did penetrate into Rome to one degree or another over the centuries. Some of the Greek rites in their early years were also a little on the wild side. But as these religions became more popular in Rome, they became more domesticated and more tame. The same thing happened to Christianity, which in its early days was well known for its personal and corporate spiritual experiences with miracles and miraculous healings of many kinds. But under Roman influence, this calmed down quite a bit, though never went completely extinct.

The following article may be of some help to your quest for knowledge

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

mysteries For much of the 20th cent. the term

I believe it was only a matter of time as to when one or other of the mystery cults was to become crystalised into a state religion, complete with authoritarian doctrine. Christianity in its final, abridged form as adopted by the Roman world post 325 AD is undoubtedly an amalgamation of many of the mystery cults that preceded it. An exerpt from the Lord's Prayer was included in an earlier post on this topic; I have at hand a copy of the Lord's Prayer - not the version which was translated from the Aramaic, then the Greek, then the Latin, then the English which has become the standard, but a direct translation from the Aramaic. Although it is undoubtedly the same prayer, what it says is significantly different to that which has been passed down from all the multiple translations. It is also a prayer which was current many years (at least 400 years ) before the gospels were written. It runs thus:

'O cosmic Birther of all radiance and vibration. Soften the ground of our being and carve out a space within us where your Presence can abide.

Fill us with your creativity so that we may be empowered to bear the fruit of your mission.

Let each of our actions bear fruit in accordance with our desire.

Endow us with the wisdom to produce and share what each being needs to grow and flourish.

Untie the tangled threads of destiny that bind us, as we release others from the entanglement of past mistakes.

Do not let us be seduced by that which would divert us from our true purpose, but illuminate the opportunities of the present moment.

For you are the ground and the fruitful vision, the birth, power and fulfillment, as all is gathered and made whole once again.'

I suggest that the 'Give us this day our daily bread', quoted earlier, actually ran: Let each of our actions bear fruit in accordance with our desire, as stated above.

I may have shot off at a tangent here, but returning to topic, I think that this original version of the Lord's Prayer at least suggests that the original Christianity, whatever form it may have taken, is, or was, seriously at odds with the authoritarian religion founded by Constantine and regarded, today, as the 'true' Christianity.

let's consider the following question?

the first era christian needs to explained what they believe to all other peolpe,

and indoctrinate them to their fundamental Biblical beliefs,

before any one, must less a, Romanus (privelege peolple of that time in the world)

to be converted to a foreign faith , who originated from a conquered and vanished country,

the lowly Judea and lowly people....even under pain of persecution and death.

you must believe that even if you will be put to death, you will loss nothing but earn more.

so you need to exposed and explained your christianity to be able to convert other people.

how could you maintained secrecy, if you will go out and wanted to convert other people.

everything is written and recorded in lowly Greek Dialect "Bible." ( The New Testament )

even the church persecution was long been propesied, after the apostle will be gone and all dead.

 

 

. As in the mystery religions, special ritual objects (the cup and bread) were revealed at the end of a long ritual only to those properly initiated. And it came to be believed that something mysterious and magical happened at the exact moment when the priest said certain words over them: that the wine and bread actually became, physically, the body and blood of Christ.

 

Needless to say, this was not the original idea, even in Rome, but the result of a development over centuries

 

Thought you might be interested in these quotes:

 

Letter from Ignatius, about 105-110) "I desire the bread of God, the heavenly bread, the bread of life--which is the flesh of Jesus Christ, the son of God."

 

Also from the letters of Ignatius: "They (the pagans) abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer, because they do not believe the Eucharist to be the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ...Those, therefore, who speak against this gift of God, incur death".

 

And from Irenaeus (about 180) "For the bread, which is produced from the earth, when it receives the invocation of God, is no longer common bread, but the Eucharist--consisting of two realities, earthly and heavenly."

 

Also from Irenaeus: "The wine and bread having recieved the Word of God, become the Eucharist, which is the body and blood of Christ".

 

Then there is Paul: "He who eats and drinks (the Eucharist) in an unworthy manner eats and drinks judgment to himself, not discerning the Lord's body" 1 Cor. 11:29,

 

There are other quotations, including ones from the Didache, Justin Martyr, and Clement that indicate that from the beginning the Eucharist was regarded as the body of Jesus.

 

 

 

 

[/i]

I think many of the points I would make in answer to the question posed by this thread have already been made.

Whatever Jesus' original message, I believe it was perceived in the west and in the Greek world, as a mystery religeon. Indeed, I'd go further, and argue that Paul deliberately cast his preaching in a style that inclined to the mysteries, and thus would appeal to Gentile (initially Greek) minds.

Many of the so-called gnostic gospels found in Egypt also posssess this "secret knowledge"/revelation to the initiated student, character.

I see the Eleusinian-type mysteries as being often about paradox - the need to die to be reborn (the simile of the wheat which has to die in order to germinate); the need to surrender self to find the true self etc.

So that the mystery of the crucifixion and resurrection (with emphasis on the former); jesus meeting with Nicodemus by night, in which he stated the need to be reborn of water and the spirit; are to me examples of this.

Mithraism seems to have had a burial rite of initiation, from which the cultist rose reborn. early excisions from Mark's gospel, which make sense of the young man running naked from Gethsemene and perhaps a different interpretation to the raising of Lazarus might suggest something that goes back to Jesus himself; or was interpolated to cater for mystic tastes.

The nativity story (only in two gospels and different); the visit of the Magi; the star etc may well also be additions to make the early writings fit better with mystery models.

Early Christianity was also quick to seize on pagan festivals and make them Christian - Christmas (25 dec) relates not to the gospels but to the traditional birthdate of Sol Invictus/Mithras.

Just some thoughts, not all of which I agree with, but which have been argued.

Phil