User talk:Julieta39

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Julieta39!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:13, 9 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Location maps never show text because they are used in almost all projects and some of them don't even use Latin letters. That's why I will revert to the last version of this file. Of course you can upload your version as a new file. NNW 12:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ah, OK. So I will do. Thanks, --Julieta39 (talk) 15:41, 31 July 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Use of photo[edit]

Hello, I would like to contact you about permission to use one of your photographs: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rep.Moldova-Codru.jpg in a publication (non-commercial) I am working on. The work would be credited as follows: “Rep-Moldova-Codru” by Julieta39, CC BY-SA 4.0. Please contact me at fuenvan@yahoo.com at your earliest convenience. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 158.232.3.98 (talk) 15:08, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Presumption of guilt on Commons[edit]

I understand that e-mail agreements are not enough for a picture. But I deplore that my maps, which are unpublished, are deleted without consultation as "violating the copyright" of the sources that I quote, whereas these sources do not present maps, but only data, or have maps different from mine (it is easy to verify this difference). --Julieta39 (talk) 14:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Derivative maps & scheme[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pr. Ion Borcea.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pr. Ion Borcea.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Sealle (talk) 17:45, 8 November 2016 (UTC) -- Permission of Peter Langyel by e-mail.Reply[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Dobrudja_protected_areas_map-fr.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Sealle (talk) 17:47, 8 November 2016 (UTC) -- Unpublished map, permission of Peter Lengyel & Constantin Chera for the places of the archaeological sites & protected areas (as list in their works).Reply[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Avioane româneşti IAR-80.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Avioane româneşti IAR-80.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Sealle (talk) 17:50, 8 November 2016 (UTC) -- Derivated drawing according with the pictures of the time (PD-old)Reply[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Edy-Saiovici.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Edy-Saiovici.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Sealle (talk) 17:51, 8 November 2016 (UTC) -- Permission of Michel Vainguer by e-mail.Reply[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Demografie R-1985-decretei.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Demografie R-1985-decretei.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Sealle (talk) 17:54, 8 November 2016 (UTC) -- Permission of INED (public french institution, public domain) by e-mail.Reply[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:CSE-Europe-Ethnic-Map.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:CSE-Europe-Ethnic-Map.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Sealle (talk) 18:02, 8 November 2016 (UTC) -- Derivated map, permission of Laszlo Sebök by e-mailReply[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Grece ottomane-fr.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Grece ottomane-fr.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Sealle (talk) 18:10, 8 November 2016 (UTC) -- Unpublished map, permission of the sources cited for the data (not maps) of their works.Reply[reply]

Pictures[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ionel si Ionutsa.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Sealle (talk) 18:12, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Romanian possad.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Sealle (talk) 18:15, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Cetatea Tighina înăuntru.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Sealle (talk) 18:20, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Nistrul în dreptul Tighinei și Parcanilor.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Sealle (talk) 18:21, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright violations[edit]

Afrikaans | azərbaycanca | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | Nederlands | norsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | sicilianu | Simple English | suomi | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | Ελληνικά | български | македонски | русский | српски / srpski | українська | հայերեն | मराठी | हिन्दी | বাংলা | മലയാളം | ไทย | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | עברית |العربية | فارسی | +/−


Hello Julieta39.

You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

Sealle (talk) 18:26, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Que Sealle efface directement, sans discussion, les photos d'autres personnes que j'ai téléchargées sans avoir mentionné leur accord, ça me paraît normal vu que c'est moi qui suis en faute. En revanche, il y en a pour lesquelles j'ai un accord (voir en-dessous l'autorisation pour 10 photos à partir de [1]), mais je ne sais pas comment l'envoyer à OTRS : est-ce moi qui dois le faire, ou lui ? Et puis il y a mes schémas et cartes utilitaires (et non artistiques) qui sont des travaux dérivés, à la fois en partie semblables aux modèles, mais en même temps bien différentes d'eux d'autant que je synthétise plusieurs sources (que je mentionne dans le cadre de l'image). Il n'y a pas de "preuve de permission" ? mais ce serait quoi exactement une telle preuve ? et qui doit la mentionner : les différents auteurs dont je me suis inspirée, ou moi ? Je vois pourtant dans Commons un grand nombre de schémas et de cartes qui, comme les miennes, mentionnent leurs sources, sans pour autant demander aux auteurs (parfois décédés) leur accord. Dans le chapitre Œuvre dérivée [2] ils ne disent rien des schémas et cartes dérivés... Ci-dessous la permission de Péter Lengyel extraite de ma messagerie... comment le faire savoir à l'OTRS ? Et lorsque je dessine une assiette (introuvable ailleurs sur le web) représentant une Chorea antique en m'inspirant vaguement des fresques minoennes et mycéniennes (cas de [3] également effacé par Sealle sans m'en parler), comment puis-je demander aux auteurs de ces fresques, morts depuis plus de 3000 ans, leur accord ? Merci ! --Julieta39 (discuter) 8 novembre 2016 à 19:57 (CET)

Se pot lua in total 10 poze, cu link catre blog. Cu prietenie, Peter

From: Julieta39 To: Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 5:51 PM Subject: Jo napot

Szervus,

Kérdés: îmi dati voie sä preiau câteva fotografii cu peisaje din Dobrogea (br. Sf-Gheorghe, faleza de la Dolojman si ale câteva) pentru ca sä le introduc în Commons (Wikipedia) în scopul de a ilistra articole relative la deltä si Dobrogea ? Desigur veti fi mentionat ca autor. Köszönöm de räspuns oricare ar fi. Búcsú, Julieta

@Julieta39: - Bonjour, ce sont les propriétaires des droits qui doivent suivre la procédure d'autorisation de republication, c'est à dire dans la majorité des cas les photographes - Cette autorisation doit être envoyée à OTRS fr:Aide:Demande d'image libre - L'autorisation que vous avez reçu n'est pas suffisante et ne pourra pas être retenue - Bonne continuation -- Lomita (discuter) 8 novembre 2016 à 20:14 (CET)
Salut, c'est clair que pour des photos comme File:Edy-Saiovici.jpg, File:Pr. Ion Borcea.jpg, il faut que le photographe place son travail sous une licence libre, en l'indiquant sur le site où il l'a publiée ou bien en écrivant au système confidentiel de volontaires OTRS indiqué ci-dessus. Et à ce qu'il me semble, pour un graphique comme File:Demografie R-1985-decretei.jpg ou des cartes comme File:CSE-Europe-Ethnic-Map.gif, File:Grece ottomane-fr.png, File:Dobrudja_protected_areas_map-fr.svg, sauf si on a le même genre d'autorisation de l'auteur il ne faut rien recopier de ce qui a une certaine originalité artistique ou de présentation comme les cases et les chiffres de légende du graphique, ou l'image de fond ou le choix des couleurs de la carte. En gros il faut tout refaire avec des logiciels (carto)graphiques, ce qui demande pas mal d'expérience, mais il y a des spécialistes sur les sous-pages de demandes de travaux de fr:WP:Atelier graphique. Oliv0 (talk) 12:28, 9 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Je comprends que les accords par courriel ne suffisent pas mais je déplore que mes cartes, qui sont inédites, soient effacées sans concertation comme "violant le copyright" des sources que je cite, alors que ces sources ne présentent pas des cartes, mais seulement des données, ou ont des cartes différentes des miennes. Too bad, comme disent les anglophones... Il paraît qu'en français ça s'appelle "suppressionnite aigüe"... --Julieta39 (talk) 14:44, 16 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please sign your postings[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  italiano  日本語  português  русский  українська  +/−
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

--SignBot (talk) 18:07, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes. I did forgotten sometimes --Julieta39 (talk) 10:33, 23 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Rivages de la Mer du Nord[edit]

Bonjour Bourrichon, pourriez-vous je vous prie, modifier la carte [4] en dessinant le rivage tel qu'il était à l'époque, avant les grandes inondations qui ont séparé les îles frisonnes du rivage ? Voici une source : [5]. Merci à vous, --Julieta39 (talk) 17:11, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bonjour, j'ai corrigé sommairement la carte (rivages du Danemark, des PB, de la Belgique), à partir de la source que tu m'as donnée, mais il me faudrait une source éventuellement plus précise et surtout incluant les rivages de la Pologne car je suppose qu'ils ont changé. À bientôt, Bourrichon (talk) 13:13, 27 October 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
A ma connaissance, d'après les cartes paléogéographiques, pas en Pologne. Les cordons littoraux de Hel et du Friesches Haff étaient déjà en place. Merci, --Julieta39 (talk) 10:33, 23 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I would suggest that when you radically retouch someone else's photo, as you did at File:Bucureşti - Biserica Sfântul Elefterie.jpg, you should upload under a different name and indicate it as a derivative work, rather than overwrite the original. There are several reasons for this: one is that retouching to this extent certainly creates separate rights for your derivative work (which should be indicated as yours). Another is that the original uploader may not be happy with such a major change to what is credited as that person's work.

This is not a judgement on whether the new version is good or bad, just that it is a distinct, derived work. - Jmabel ! talk 07:04, 23 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK I will did it with the pictures also. With the maps I must already do it, except if, as Bourrichon, the first uploader accept the improving of his document, --Julieta39 (talk) 10:33, 23 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, sure, if you know that the original author welcomes the improvement, that is fine. - Jmabel ! talk 17:25, 23 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Carte des sites du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Эlcobbola talk 17:18, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This isn't your own work, Did you check into he death years for the listed authors? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:26, 6 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Resolved. Thanks for updating. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:34, 6 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Hungarian-Romanian War.en.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rgvis (talk) 10:24, 25 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This map is not a copy of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kelly_Miller%27s_history_of_the_world_war_for_human_right;_being_an_intensely_human_and_brilliant_account_of_the_world_war_and_why_and_for_what_purpose_America_and_the_allies_are_fighting_and_the_(14595424610).jpg showing exclusively the 1914 lands of Austro-Hungary, but a derivative work, showing more other details according with several historic maps from Hans-Erich Stier's (dir.) Grosser Atlas zur Weltgeschichte, Westermann 1985, (ISBN 3-14-100919-8), Putzger's Historischer Weltatlas, Cornelsen 1990, (ISBN 3-464-00176-8), Georges Duby's Atlas historique Larousse 1987, (ISBN 2-03-503009-9), the « Atlas des Peuples » of André & Jean Sellier, La Découverte publ., : Europe centrale, 1992, (ISBN 2-7071-2032-4) the Történelmi atlasz, Hungarian academy publ. 1991, (ISBN 963-351-422-3) CM and the Atlas istorico-geografic, Romanian academy publ. 1995, (ISBN 973-27-0500-0).--Julieta39 (talk) 17:16, 25 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:Hungarian-Romanian War.de.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rgvis (talk) 10:25, 25 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This map is not a copy of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kelly_Miller%27s_history_of_the_world_war_for_human_right;_being_an_intensely_human_and_brilliant_account_of_the_world_war_and_why_and_for_what_purpose_America_and_the_allies_are_fighting_and_the_(14595424610).jpg showing exclusively the 1914 lands of Austro-Hungary, but a derivative work, showing more other details according with several historic maps from Hans-Erich Stier's (dir.) Grosser Atlas zur Weltgeschichte, Westermann 1985, (ISBN 3-14-100919-8), Putzger's Historischer Weltatlas, Cornelsen 1990, (ISBN 3-464-00176-8), Georges Duby's Atlas historique Larousse 1987, (ISBN 2-03-503009-9), the « Atlas des Peuples » of André & Jean Sellier, La Découverte publ., : Europe centrale, 1992, (ISBN 2-7071-2032-4) the Történelmi atlasz, Hungarian academy publ. 1991, (ISBN 963-351-422-3) CM and the Atlas istorico-geografic, Romanian academy publ. 1995, (ISBN 973-27-0500-0).--Julieta39 (talk) 17:16, 25 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:WallachianCoatOfArms1700.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Original research. Wikimedia Commons is abused to add this garbage into other Wikipedias. Anybody is free to color black and white images or create imaginary coat of arms, but adding them into dozens of articles as if they are historically accurate is the worst form of original research. A thorough review of all this user's uploads is warranted. I also suspect him of being just one avatar of a wider sockpuppet farm. Mihai (talk) 20:02, 23 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We must be coherent: if this version with azure stain is a "garbage" (what friendly opinion!), then the color versions appearing on all Romanian coats of arms (here [6], here [7], here [8], here [9] or here [10]) are also "garbage". On a hand, this means that all the heraldists who since the 19th century have chosen versions with azure stain, were incompetent and did "worst forms of original research". On the other hand, all these color versions may be erased and replaced with argent stain versions, according with the black-and-white books from which the black & white versions are uploaded (as D. Gusti, Constantin Orghidan, Mircea Vulcanescu & Virgiliu Leonte, Enciclopedia României, Imprimeria Naţională. Bucureşti 1938-1943). --Julieta39 (talk) 16:02, 15 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

DE: Hallo, ich habe einige Anmerkungen zu deiner neu hochgeladenen Datei. Und zwar passen einige Abkürzung nicht. Montenegro (MN) hat ISO-Code ME, Nordmazedonien hat noch MK (das Kfz-Kennzeichen bereits NMK), und der Kosovo hat noch keins zugeteilt, aber niemand verwendet KV. Du hast die Auswahl. Es gibt RKS (Kfz-Kennzeichen) oder ganz einfach KS. Manchmal taucht aber auch XK bzw. XKX auf. Aber ich denke mit KS ist es auch gemacht. Außerdem hat Slowenien SI und Bosnien BA. Viele Grüße, --ElmedinRKS (talk) 19:32, 14 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

EN: Hello, I have some annotations to your new uploaded file. Your abbreviations do not fit. Montenegro (MN) has the ISO-code ME, North Macedonia still has MK (the Car plates have NMK) and Kosovo still does not have an ISO-code but nobody use KV. You have the choice. There are RKS (car plate) or quite simply KS. Usually there is XK or XKX too. But I think KS would be fine. Moreover Slovenia has SI and Bosnia and Hercegovina BA. Kind regards, --ElmedinRKS (talk) 19:40, 14 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ich werde diese Karte korrigieren!, --Julieta39 (talk) 16:03, 15 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, Julieta39, I beg to differ: the Dobruja was ceded by Romania according to the Treaty of Bucharest, not "leased" to the Central Powers, as you suggested. Please see the Article X, paragraph b of the treaty: "b. Roumania cedes to the Allied Powers the part of the Dobrudja situated to the north of the new frontier line described in paragraph a, down to the Danube and exactly between the forking of the river and the Black Sea even to St. George's Arm. The Danube frontier between the territories ceded to the Allied Powers and Roumania will follow the thalweg of the stream. The details regarding the determination of the thalweg must be agreed upon between the interested Powers immediately after the signing of the peace treaty; the delimitation will take place in the autumn of 1918 at low-water mark. The Allied Powers will see to it that Roumania obtains a guaranteed commercial road to the Black Sea by way of Cernavoda and Constanza." See also the German translation: "Rumänien tritt an die verbündeten Mächte den nördlich unter der a beschriebenen neuen Grenzlinie liegenden teil der Dobrudscha bis zur Donau ab, und zwar zwischen der Gabelung des Stromes und dem Schwaren Meere bis zum St. Georgsarm." That should be made clear in the map. Please also see that according to the 1st article of the preliminary peace Treaty of Buftea, Romania had already agreed to cede Dobruja, and according to the Protocol of transfer of Northern Dobruja to Bulgaria and the correction of the Bulgarian-Turkish border on the Maritsa river, the Central Powers agreed to transfer the rest of Northern Dobruja to Bulgaria. That wouldn't have been possible if the territory had belonged to Romania. Cheers, Mentatus (talk) 08:25, 25 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:MongolEmpireDivisions1300.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zhu Zi Ling (talk) 20:23, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the quick response![edit]

I want to make a Russian version of the map of the Khazar Khaganate. Can you send me this map in swg format? --Максим Кузахметов (talk) 21:42, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Maksim Kuzahmetov! Sorry but I can work only with Photoshop (producing .png, .jpg, .pdf, etc bitmap images, but not .svg). About the east-roman languages and the area of the "vlachs" we have only three certainties: 1- all the contradictory nationalist theories are probably wrong because present Romania, Thessaly & Pindus are out onf the main romanisation-area of the Dacian-Thracian peoples (the both banks of the Low-Danube in the northern slopes of the Stara-Planina Balkans - see Konstantin Jirecek's line); 2- the main activity of the romance-speaking people between 270 and 1270 was pastoral transhumance as shepherds, and sheep, wool and cheese trade, so their nomadic life does not allow us to assign them a closed and precise place to live; 3- the byzantine sources cite them where they met them: to the south (present Greece) and the russian sources (Повѣсть времяньныхъ лѣтъ) cite them where the Rus' people met them: on the north (present Romania). But about the "vlachs" (word meaning again today "romance-speaking person" and "shepherd" in many modern languages: olàh, vlahos, vlas, vlas...), the nationalist history and modern sources wants to assign them and their origins in a little area exclusively in present Greece and Macedonia (austrian and mainly hungarian historians) or, on the contrary, exclusively in Romania (romanian, south-slavic and greek historians). That's why, on the Khazars map, as a middle solution, I placed them near the Iron Gates of the Danube. --Julieta39 (talk) 10:01, 16 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I guess this is the map that Maksim is talking about: File:Chasaren.jpg, uploaded here again: File: Khazar Empire.jpg. The only solution to get the vectorial version is to ask the original author, Frode Inge Helland. Or, maybe, to remake the map with the SRTM base and rewrite in Russian.--Kunok Kipcsak (talk) 12:26, 16 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Russian Empire in 1918?[edit]

Julieta39, where did you get that Russian Empire existed in 1918? Maybe you would change that inscription to something like German Empire occupation zone? How about? Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 05:18, 16 September 2020 (UTC) /You're right. Done! --Julieta39 (talk) 15:48, 16 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Julieta39, I like do not want to bug you, but may be I was not specific. I was talking about that label "Russian Empire" in place when in 1918 there actually were forming Polish territories under Regency Council. It is not a big of a deal. Whatever is clever. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 23:12, 16 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
ooh, I just noticed changes, looks good, moving on. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 23:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:LanguesMoldavie.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:LanguesMoldavie.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Sealle (talk) 14:52, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Je n'ai pas téléchargé mais seulement amélioré cette version française de [11] faite par "Felix Vainguer" avec S.I. Cepleanu (F.V. a vérifié les données, S.I.C. a dessiné la carte). I did not download but only improved this french version from [12] by "Felix Vainguer" (data collector) and S.I. Cepleanu (cartographer). --Julieta39 (talk) 19:25, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:G-Freedom.png[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:G-Freedom.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sealle (talk) 12:51, 6 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Дельта Дунаю Delta Dunării.png[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Дельта Дунаю Delta Dunării.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sealle (talk) 12:54, 6 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Cernăuți str. Ivan Franko (fostă Brâncoveanu) placă Eminescu.png[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Cernăuți str. Ivan Franko (fostă Brâncoveanu) placă Eminescu.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sealle (talk) 12:54, 6 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please remain calm and collegial[edit]

català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  magyar  Nederlands  português  polski  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  עברית  +/−


It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks!

--Sealle (talk) 17:31, 11 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Sealle. Normally in a court the defendants have the right to explain themselves. On Commons no. If they do, we delete their addition and accuse them of being rude and agitated. While prosecutors rig them with contemptuous qualifiers. No comment ! --Julieta39 (talk) 11:28, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I've been bending over backwards to refrain from blocking you. I will do so no longer. If you continue to make unproductive or disruptive edits, you'll be blocked. Эlcobbola talk 11:39, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Да, видел, и спасибо. Я пытался исправить наши ошибки регистрации и знаю, что вы убираете только то, что не в порядке. Но я честно говорю вам, что если вы заблокируете меня, а также другие аккаунты, подозреваемые в том, что они марионетки Чепляну, я бы не рассердился, наоборот. Лучше. Yes, I saw, and thank you. I tried to correct our mistakes and I know you are only cleaning up what is wrong. But I tell you frankly that if you block me, as well as the other accounts suspected of being puppets of Cepleanu, I would not be angry, on the contrary, it's better. До свидания ! Good bye. --Julieta39 (talk) 11:56, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Lespezi - Biertan.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lespezi - Biertan.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sealle (talk) 11:39, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Serviciul Maritim Român Afiș.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Serviciul Maritim Român Afiș.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Sealle (talk) 11:40, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Roumanos2.jpg[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Roumanos2.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sealle (talk) 11:42, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Coat of arms of Moldavia under Nicolae Mavrocordat.png[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Coat of arms of Moldavia under Nicolae Mavrocordat.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 09:39, 2 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:PasUneMachine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

104.219.53.141 09:01, 8 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bolohoveni land from A.V. Boldur description.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kun Kipcsak (talk) 17:54, 24 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Kis-vlachföldek.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Enlightenment1685 (talk) 10:43, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:EthnicRussiansInTheFormerUSSR.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 15:05, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Muromian-map.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 15:14, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 22 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Aripi x 3.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]