User talk:QuartierLatin1968

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Direct action! Power to the people!

Welcome to the World of the Wiki? LoopZilla 2005-07-05 22:40:26 (UTC)

Chachacha! QuartierLatin1968 7 July 2005 15:04 (UTC)

Tamil Eelam map[edit]

Puttalam is actually not in the Tamil Eelam claim. It used to be a predominantly Tamil-speaking area but now is a mainly Sinhala speaking area. The LTTE's claim does not include this district, see under (1/ Interim self-governing authority):

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/3232913.stm

Therefore, the map is incorrect. 81.110.30.216 13:21, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! I delete the category because an image must be categorized by the tag and put cateogory:Public domain isn't need. The tag PD-other was deleted because doesn't exist. --RED DEVIL 666 21:38, 24 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

if you put tag GFDL, you must not put it into category Public domain. It is a mistake. Call me for other problems :-) --RED DEVIL 666 14:59, 25 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nantes[edit]

There is ermine at image:Gwenn ha du.svg/Image:BlasonBRETAGNE.jpg and many usable ships at category:Sailboats in heraldry. You can get a basic scutcheon from image:sin escudo.svg (or .png)/Image:Häraldisk ginstam.png. Quant à la couronne, si tu veux en ajouter une, cf. l'Image:Escudo Vilar de Barrio.jpg ou bien Image:Escudo Arzúa.jpg.

Xinjiang maps[edit]

Hi QuartierLatin, just a couple of comments on your Xinjiang maps. First of all, Image:Xinjiang prefectures template.png is excellent! Much cleaner than before. I have a few queries about Image:Xinjiang nationalities by prefecture 2000.png though. First of all the colour guide needs sharper divisions I think, while the gradient is very pretty, it's also very imprecise. I also find it somewhat misleading. Like the top region is yellow, to my eye looks like about 30% Kazakh? So who are the other 70%? Same with the lightest blue regions and the lightest red one on the left. Also where did you get the data from? It would be more informative if it was actually on that page, because your links don't lead anywhere. Anyway just some thoughts... cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 08:49, 29 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Map of percentage Welsh speakers by area[edit]

What statistical survey is the information on this map taken? Is it based on the 2001 census? 'Lloffiwr' the preceding unsigned comment is by 80.189.242.107 (talk • contribs)

In a word, yes. If I remember correctly, it counts everybody who can read or write or speak or understand Welsh, and any combination thereof. (The census conveniently provides a breakdown for all four skills.) QuartierLatin1968 21:32, 11 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you for your prompt reply. 'Lloffiwr'

Partitions of Luxembourg[edit]

Although I think that Image:LuxembourgPartitionsMap.png is a very useful map, I have two qualms about it:

  1. On the 'arm' that juts out of the south-west of the Belgian cession, to the west of the Duchy of Bouillon, the border of the ceded territories goes over the modern Franco-Belgian border. Is this intentional or in error? Since France and Belgium have not exchanged any territories since, I believe that the boundaries of the cession ought to stop on the modern border.
  2. Prussia received their territories from Luxembourg under the Treaty of Paris (1815), and not from the date of Prussian occupation (which did indeed begin in 1813).

I'd be much obliged if you could get back to me about these issues. Bastin 14:17, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Image deletion warning Image:IraqiKurdistan map2006.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Cat out 09:31, 21 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not your fault, it is the en uploaders fault. You cleaned it up really well but copyrights are still the issue. --Cat out 16:09, 21 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Speedy deleted[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  svenska  Türkçe українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Hello QuartierLatin1968,

the following content you uploaded is not free and therefore had to be deleted:

Image:Cornwall fishing boats2.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files which can be used for any purpose, including:

  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on the Wikimedia Commons. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on the Wikimedia Commons: "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload works you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial to understanding how the Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions. Fred Chess 09:09, 7 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I noticed your note on this map to ask for speedy deletion, so I have placed {{speedy}} on it. --Astrokey44 03:33, 20 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Dessalines.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Dessalines.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Shizhao 01:29, 22 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]


asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Communauté_germanophone_drapeau.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 16:35, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 15:42, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The uploader is user:Fusslkopp. I just gave her (or his) image a new name, because she had (I believe unintentionally) overwritten the widely-used image:Mercurius.jpg. Please refer any licensing questions to her. Cheers, QuartierLatin1968 21:34, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Copied. Siebrand 18:46, 15 July 2007 (UTC)`Reply[reply]

Blason de Nantes[edit]

J'ai fait une version SVG du Blason de la ville de Nantes. J'ai pris la liberté de remplacer ton blason par le mien sur les differents wiki.

Moktoipas 19:43, 15 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Maps of Turkey[edit]

Hello. I have created them long time ago and it was very quick and not exactly correct. Feel free to correct them. Cheers. - Darwinek 15:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Irish Shore of Newfoundland's Avalon[edit]

Hi there.

I left a note on the image itself, but it's been 2 years since it was last updated so I figured I'd drop in here, as well.

The Irish shore should definitely be modified to include the stretch between St. Bride's and Placentia (commonly called the Cape Shore), which is wholly Irish. I also would argue the town of Placentia should be included as well, as it has had a large Irish majority (certainly larger than Harbour Grace's or St. John's) since the 1700's.

As this data shows, settlement in Placentia Bay prior to the 19th century was 75% Irish; this includes the largely English inner reaches of the bay (north of the town of Placentia itself)

Cheers! Trollcollins 04:51, 22 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please see my comment here. Dbachmann 09:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Portugal[edit]

Hello QuartierLatin1968 (great name!). I see some changes have been made to this image. However the changes regarding present Portuguese territory are not correct - and I'm not speaking about the Lusitanians (although the consensual modern hipotesys is that they were Proto-Celt, which is quite close to Celt...). The area grey area of the Lusitanians is excessive and the southern part of Portugal (the Algarve), shoul be green - even in Image:Prehispanic languages.gif it states "ancient south-lusitanian area afterwards celticized", in fact it was an area initially inhabited by the Cynetes or Conii (probably Tartessian) and later colonized by the Celtici of Alentejo. You should look up this detailed and sourced scholar ethnographic map of Iberia in 200 BC. Please correct the mistakes - or if you want I can do it!

The ethnographic and linguistic panorama of the Iberian Peninsula at about 200 BCE (at the end of the Second Punic War), based on the map I mentioned just above (a pdf version, with extensive and detailed information in Portuguese on the criteria used, as well as the long bibliography used to source the map can be found here), done by Portuguese Archeologist Luís Fraga (luisfraga@arqueotavira.com), from the "Campo Arqueológico de Tavira" (Tavira Archeological Camp - official site), in Tavira, Algarve (Portugal), looks somethings like this one I just made:
The Ogre 04:59, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, I have added this useful map to the French wiki article about Welsh (fr:Gallois), however I think precisions about the source of the figures and their date would be welcome. Since you uploaded the file to Commons, perhaps you could add some ? Thank you in advance, Aucassin 20:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

continental map[edit]

[1] seems to be wrong, Georgia is not in Europe. The border is north of the country. --Bachforelle (talk) 09:20, 22 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There's no 'border'. Different geographers have different notions of where this purely artificial boundary ought to go. One such notion involves a line running through the middle of Georgia and Azerbaijan. QuartierLatin1968 (talk) 19:09, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yep but any textbook since en:Philip Johan von Strahlenberg says Georgia is in Asia. There is a consensus between geographers. Wikipedia shouldn't be used to establish new theories, or push POV. Please look at this [map]. --Bachforelle (talk) 06:36, 26 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Drop it. There's no consensus. I'm not pushing any POV. And heaps of people think Georgia is in Europe. QuartierLatin1968 (talk) 10:43, 28 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The Flickr images found in Joe Genario's photostream have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Jappalang (talk) 12:28, 7 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, QuartierLatin1968!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Yerel seçim 2009.png was uncategorized on 30 March 2009, but then categorized (by me) on 31 March 2009.
True, Image:Whiterose.png is uncategorized. But it's been superseded by a svg file anyway.
Thanks for your diligence, however. QuartierLatin1968 (talk) 20:43, 8 September 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

TUSC token 64f625a19650f05e4f3f78ccb28f412c[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! QuartierLatin1968 (talk) 13:18, 22 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]


bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Iraqi Turkmen UNPO flag.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 16:33, 23 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Iraqi Turkmen UNPO flag.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 04:20, 24 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Scuto Battersea BritMu252a.jpg[edit]

Hi there, we have used this pic in this article: http://www.blatantworld.com/documentary/britain_bc_part_1_of_2.html cheers for providing it under license

It's my pleasure, I assure you! :-) QuartierLatin1968 (talk) 23:48, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
File:North_Eastern_province_Tamil_Eelam.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rehman(+) 11:59, 7 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:LocationCaricom.png[edit]

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:LocationCaricom.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:42, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear QuartierLatin1968,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 04:08, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
File:Avalon fullmap.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AFBorchert (talk) 11:22, 9 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 7 February 2014. Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear QuartierLatin1968,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Celtic Nations[edit]

Hi, could you take a look at File:Map of Celtic Nations-flag shades.svg. The current version appears to include the Channel Islands as part of Brittany. Please reinstate your last version, which was just fine. Many thanks, Daicaregos (talk) 09:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done! Thanks for pointing this out. QuartierLatin1968 (talk) 15:50, 8 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tricéphale Carnavalet[edit]

I have added a photograph from an old paper : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tricephale_divinity.png can you check to see if I did it right? Evpok (talk) 12:08, 9 September 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Dessalines.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Dessalines.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Dessalines.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

-- Cirt (talk) 14:06, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open![edit]

Dear QuartierLatin1968,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)


File:Red flag waving transparent.png has been marked for speedy deletion. A reason for the tagging has not been detected or none was placed.

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 85.76.143.50.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 16:12, 8 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]